Search This Blog

Thursday, April 19, 2012

The Change Learning Theory and Impact for Online Learning

Dirkx, Gilley, & Gilley (2004) wrote that "learning and change are conceptualized largely as cognitive, decontextualized, individualized, and solitary practices" (p. 36).  Learning online typically requires a collaborative effort between instructor and learner, and learner to learner.  As learners increasingly face changes in the knowledge and expertise required in work (to deliver products and services) and school (to deliver assignments), learning and change must become less individualized and solitary as people depend upon each other to ensure the required deliverables.  Learning online requires a change toward collaboration and learning communities in order to gain and sustain new knowledge, and the individual becomes part of the new identity (Dirkx et al., 2004).  Ultimately, without every person "improving his or her respective skills, competencies, knowledge, and attitudes" (Dirkx et al., 2004, p. 41), change and performance improvement cannot happen. 

In order to gain cooperation during the development of online collaborative teams and learning communities, instructors need to incrementally address change with students by reinforcing and supporting learning activities (Dirkx et al., 2004).  Incremental integration of desired changes improves learners' acceptance of change.  Accepting change is critical to completely integrating new knowledge/information. 

"Refreezing" (Dirkx et al., 2004, p. 43) learners' new behaviors brought about by the desired changes then invokes a new culture that can support such learning processes as seen in collaborative learning teams.  Such teams fall short of embracing change because of the "lack of instructor or management support for change; internal conflict for resources; recognition and rewards, organizational overconfidence, lack of critical reflection skills, and the lack of commitment to change" (Dirkx et al., 2004, p. 45).

AIPPG.com (2011) also reported on Lewin's Change Theory: "one’s behavior is related both to one’s personal characteristics and to the social situation in which one finds oneself" (par. 1).  Lewin's concepts included: (1) driving forces, which push in a direction that causes change to occur, facilitate change because they push the person in the desired direction, and cause a shift in the equilibrium     towards change, (2) restraining forces, which counter driving forces, hinder change because they push the person in the opposite direction, and cause a shift in the equilibrium which opposes change, and (3) an equilibrium, which is a state of being where driving forces equal restraining forces and no change occurs, and can be raised or lowered by changes that occur between the driving and restraining forces.  (par. 2)

AIPPG.com (2004) Lewin's change theory includes three stages: the first stage is unfreezing, which is the process which involves finding a method of making it possible for people to let go of an old pattern that was counterproductive in some way, is necessary to overcome the strains of Individual resistance and group conformity, and can be achieved by the use of three methods (increase the driving forces that direct behavior away from the existing situation or status quo, decrease the restraining forces that negatively affect the movement from the existing equilibrium, and finding a combination of the two methods listed above).  The second stage is moving to a new level or changing…involving a process of change in thoughts, feeling, behavior, or all three, that is in some way more liberating or more productive.  The third stage is refreezing, which establishes the change as a new habit, so that it now becomes the 'standard operating procedure'; without this stage of refreezing, it is easy to go back to the old ways.  (par. 2)

Successfully applying Lewin's change theory requires analyzing the driving and restraining forces before a planned change is implemented.  The implication of Lewin's Change Theory for teaching adults online could include a school's preadmission department assessing an online student's technical and writing skills.  Online learners must have the prerequisite skills required for working within a school's online platform.  New learners successfully meeting the skills criteria can begin an online class, and incrementally be given assignments to increase the number of technical and writing skills required for the current and future classes.  By carefully monitoring issues new online students are having, and giving them additional tools if needed, the restraining forces decrease, and the SOP becomes the norm.

Kritsonis (2004) presents additional change theories:  Lippitt’s Phases of Change Theory, which posits that "changes are more likely to be stable if they spread to neighboring systems or to sub-parts of the system immediately affected, and changes are better rooted" (p. 1).  For example, online students frequently have to join in an online class forum.  Being given an assignment that provides students with an opportunity to discuss problems occurring with web searches, all students can learn from each other and the instructor about how to solve those problems.  The new skills learned in how to solve those problems then become the normal and accepted manner. 

Prochaska and DiClemente’s Change Theory posits that "people pass through a series of stages when change occurs, and the stages discussed in their change theory are: precontemplation, contemplation, preparation, action, and maintenance" (Kritsonis, 2004, p. 2). Because progressing through these phases is cyclical, not linear, learners relapse during their efforts to change, and must cycle through the process sometimes repeatedly (Kritsonis, 2004).  Online students who are assigned work teams all have different skillsets for working collaboratively.  A team leader typically emerges, and others begin to follow new processes required of the team as assignments are designed and submitted.  A good team (as monitored by the instructor) assists each other through trouble spots such as with writing, researching, or technical issues.  Some members will achieve completing assignments due to the new advice/processes, and others will not.  Those who do not can be assisted further, patiently, and be given different advice or tools to work through until success is achieved. 

The Social Cognitive Theory presents that "individuals can learn by direct experiences, human dialogue and interaction, and observation.  This theory proposes that behavior change is affected by environmental influences, personal factors, and attributes of the behavior itself" (Kritsonis, 2004, p. 4).  Since learners must exhibit a degree of self-efficacy, be confident in their ability to exhibit the required behavior, and know there is an applicable incentive to perform, such theory can be used by an instructor when an online team must use an online social software program to complete an assignment.  Such a program could be a wiki or blog.  As the team works on developing and using such a program to complete an assignment, all team members observe, interact, and discuss within the program how the project is progressing.  

The Theory of Reasoned Action and Planned Behavior, which posits that a learner's performance of an assigned behavior is ruled by the learner's positive intention to carry out the behavior (Kritsonis, 2004).  This theory also includes the influence from the learner's social environment.   The change theories often make rational sense but can side-track learning progress if learners' feelings, attitudes, past input, and experiences are not considered (Kritsonis, 2004).  Disregarding such elements causes resistance.  Instructors and learners must continue to strive together as technology and cultural issues emerge if change is to be recognized as a much needed part of online learning.

References:

AIPPG.com (2011). Change theory: Kurt Lewin. Retrieved from http://currentnursing.com/nursing_theory/change_theory.html

Dirkx, J., Gilley, J., & Gilley, M.A. (2004). Change theory in CPE and HRD:
Toward a holistic view of learning and change in work. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 6(1), 35-51. Retrieved from ProQuest Education Journals.Press the Escape key to close

Kritsonis, A. (2004-2005). Comparison of change theories. International Journal Of Scholarly Academic Intellectual Diversity, 8(1), 1-7. Retrieved from http://www.nationalforum.com/
Electronic%20Journal%20Volumes/Kritsonis%2C%20Alicia%20Comparison%20of%20Change%20Theories.pdf